But it seems to me questionable whether any government has the right to demand loyalty from its citizens beyond its willingness or ability to render actual protection.
-Quezon To MacArthur, January 28, 1942
For once, I agree absolutely with Bong Montesa: never play the game of chicken. If this recent Inquirer editorial pointed out the administration has so botched up the peace process and is zigzagging so clumsily today, as to make the restoration of peace so much more difficult, the subsequent Inquirer editorial,suggests the MILF finds itself in a bind, because of the hostilities that have erupted and for which it took credit. Pointing to August 22 news item MILF Chair Al Haj Murad raise points in meeting IMT and the from Luawaran.com,’ the editorial suggested that the MILF (or the faction of its leadership that wanted to achieve its political aims through negotiations) was trying to invoke the assistance of its Malaysian sponsors. See –MILF asks Malaysia to convene peace panel – INQUIRER.net, Philippine News for Filipinos
Davao City councilor Peter Lavina in his bog, suggests that the Malaysian government officially speaking, is supportive. But the political reality in Malaysia is that the government is in its own version of survival mode. Lip service and a little diplomatic nudging here and there is all very good, but in determining the cost-effectiveness of using a nation’s resources (diplomacy, economics, military, etc.) there is little going for Malaysia if it publicly supports armed rebellion on the part of the MILF.
Militarily, even, the dilemma is there. If you assume, as some do, that the MILF possesses SAM’s in its inventory, it cannot use them now, or even later. For to do so would provide proof of foreign funding or at least facilitation/support; and regionally speaking, Malaysia as the likely culprit would trigger unease in Indonesia and alarm countries like Thailand (both being firm U.S. allies) which is fighting its own Muslim secessionists.
And so it seems the last-ditch appeal, perhaps by the more moderate among the MILF’s leadership, is for the Malaysians to give a sign that they continue to enjoy that country’s confidence and backing, in an effort to convince the other foreign powers to head off full-blown hostilities. Again, here is a confluence of interests: the Americans wouldn’t be too keen on hostilities because as the primary funder of our armed forces it would have to foot the bill and this includes what the Americans know all too well includes lining generals’ pockets (see Who Profits From The War in Mindanao? | Filipino Voices). It wouldn’t even really help the American arms industry. Not much money to be gained with out Korea and Vietnam War-era weaponry.Add to this the possibility that SouthEast Asia, including the Philippines, exists in a kind of policy limbo vis-a-vis Washington: In Asia » Blog Archive » Asian Policy Challenges for the Next President.
But that doesn’t mean that these nations could prevent a shooting war, either.
So when the MILF announced, on August 21, it would hold a press conference on August 23, I had deep misgivings. What would they say? After their former brio, they’d been complaining that AFP uses excessive force in attack pulverizing Muslim communities, which ignores who started the fighting or the absurdity of expecting the AFP not to send in the PAF.
Though they did have a point in saying MILF: CAFGUs, CVOs, plus Pinol, et al=Ilagas which the PNP, for one, validated by the tactic of arming civilian militias (see PNP sending shotguns to Mindanao auxiliaries – INQUIRER.net, Philippine News for Filipinos). The news of state-armed militias is indeed troubling; it is a sign of weakness and does not address the sort of insecurities that led to this: see Iligan City Hall Sights « preMEDitated.
Where did this insecurity come from? On one part, the public being unsure of what, really, the administration’s game plan was concerning Mindanao (in a nutshell: An irresponsible response « Mon Casiple’s Weblog on Philippine Politics). Second, the Palace having to respond to public hostility to its peace plan, and that response being at best, a confusing combination of bluster and appeasement. ALthough RG Cruz puts forward the Palace line of a STRATEGY CHANGE | RG CRUZ which suggests some sort of rhyme or reason, crude zigzaging seems a more appropriate description: Malacañang Backtracks on BJE MoA Even As Supreme Court Set to Rule on Constitutionality » The Warrior Lawyer | Philippine Lawyer.
Third, uncertainty concerning traditional allies such as the United States (see US silent on MILF terrorism « Peter Laviña New Blog) and Fourth, the possibility that the armed forces intervened by mounting operations even when the President hadn’t quite made up her mind on that to do. In his blog, thenutbox actually suggests the President announced offensive operations to retroactively rubberstamp the armed forces’ decision to begin them, regardless of the President’s position on the matter:
What my uncle told me was that Mrs. Arroyo actually ordered the attacks against MILF after the generals have already decided to launch the AFP offensive.
Arroyo’s inability to control her temper, his hypothesis went on, is actually borne out of her fright of the generals’ deciding by themselves without consulting her. She made a complete turn-around in his policy towards the MILF to appease the generals who were clearly pissed off with the BJE deal she made with the rebel group. And she wanted to appease the generals as soon as possible, hence her uncontrolled emotions for the delay of the taping.
At first I dismissed this as another conspiracy theory from a Gloria-hater. But veteran journalist Ellen Tordessillias, in a reply to a comment I posted on her blog, confirmed that, indeed, the anti-MILF mopping operations were actually carried out before the Bitch ordered them.
Note that Tordesilla’s military sources are excellent. I’d also heard on my own from a retired senior officer that Camp Aguinaldo had leaked the RP-MILF agreement to the media in the first place, and when I asked the retired officer if the agreement had the sanction of the AFP, the retired officer had emphatically shaken his head and said, “no, the AFP will fight!”
Note that Tordesilla’s military sources are excellent. I’d also heard on my own from a retired senior officer that Camp Aguinaldo had leaked the RP-MILF agreement to the media in the first place, and when I asked the retired officer if the agreement had the sanction of the AFP, the retired officer had emphatically shaken his head and said, “no, the AFP will fight!”
Put another way (see Philippine Politics 04: Arroyo needs to defend and explain the MOA-AD) if the President really did see the deal as an opportunity to display statesmanship, her statesmanlike resolve dissolved quite quickly, indeed. And Fifth, I’d say, a kind of latent nationalism everyone in official circles had assumed wasn’t there anymore (see This is what will happen to the Philippines after signing the GRP – MILF Memorandum of Agreement : OTWOMD | Bluepanjeet.Net)
The President hasn’t given supporters of the peace deal any chance to save themselves or the cause of peace. Which, sad to say, has been the repeated experience of those who still suffer from the delusion that they can achieve their idealistic goals by means of a pragmatic alliance with the President.
So if there are defenders, still, of the MOA: MOA-AD a path to peace, says Archbishop Quevedo « SCRIPTORIUM and refer to Red’s Herring: SC review imperils Mindanao peace process; then see The Palace’s High Cost of Learning | ralphguzman.org.
And refer to GOING IN CIRCLES « THE MOUNT BALATUCAN MONITOR and PUSONG MAMON « THE MOUNT BALATUCAN MONITOR to get a glimpse into how people -particularly Filipinos seized by uncertainty in the affected areas of Mindanao- began to send the message to civilian and military officials alike that in the absence of any reassuring information that the government knew what it was doing and would defend citizens seized by panic, that they would then take matters into their own hands.
And the would do so in the manner of their forefahers, see Viva Iligan! « preMEDitated:
In the speech, he appealed for:
Calm.
Bravery.
Community.
And Solidarity.He also urged community leaders to lead the people under them, to prepare for the worst, and fight if the need arose. He also mentioned the presence of the tanks and the several thousand strong army defending Iligan.
He also mentioned that the people of Iligan should not be afraid because God and Senior San Miguel was on our side. He closed his speech with a, “Viva Senior San Miguel!, to which the people heartily replied a “Viva”.
Although, I’m Protestant and do not agree with Catholic veneration of saints and even angels, I could not help but realize that the Mayor was speaking the heart language of the Iliganon, something that they could understand. He was speaking the old language of the Spanish times at the time when the citizens of the old fort of Iligan defended the fort and even waged battle against the Moros. Historically, even though Iligan was just a doorstep away from the Moro stronghold of Marawi, it was never conquered by Muslims despite the fact that at that time their pirates raided Christian towns as far away as Luzon.
“War,” Clausewitz famously wrote, “is the continuation of politics by other means.” Samuel Johnson also famously warned that “patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels,” and yet it is also a time when a formerly divided people can find unity and leaders can tap into a kind of mystical reservoir of national solidarity and idealism:
As Juned Sonido, perhaps one of the most even-tempered bloggers around reflected, in a time of conflict there is the need to be aware of the dangers of jingoism and the imperative that should weigh heavily on all those in authority: to provide protection from those who hold allegiance to the state. What distinguishes the two? A clear and present danger, a compelling need:
At present waltzing around the negotiation table is as useful as cupping a corpse. It is hard to negotiate when one side has not given up the armed option or has no control over its army while the other side seems to be following the likes Neville Chamberlain at Munich – practicing vermi-negotiation or the art and science of negotiations by the worms at Munich.
Meanwhile, the war continues and people are hurt. A few hours ago a bomb was exploded in Zamboanga. Will this again reach the other corners of the country. Another bomb in the MRT or LRT?
Is this jingoism? No. This is a matter of national self defense.
It is the duty of the State to protect the citizens who opt to stay in this country. Otherwise these same citizens will go to other means to protect themselves.
You have to wonder whether such viligantism can view anything other than bloodcurdling hostility as acceptable.
By way of Carl Parkes — FriskoDude: Philippines: The Sulu Zone of Peace who points us to Jolo’s gun culture – Sidetrip with Howie Severino, we catch a glimpse of the complexities of conflict and clan relationships among the Moros. Those like the Catholic bishops clamoring for peace know from personal experience that peace is possible but peace between Christians and Muslims is made doubly difficult as peace among the Moros is difficult enough to achieve. Though it can be done: see A Lesson on Clan Conflict Resolution in the Philippines.
The reality however is that even though it’s always denied it, the Palace is sensitive to public opinion particularly when that opinion starts triggering May, 2001 flashbacks in the President’s inner circle.
Where that opinion is -and how it’s increasingly hostile to any policy other than crushing the MILF- can be gleaned from surveying the blogosphere:
See The Journal of The Jester-in-Exile: Are Yu Dif? Didna Her? then The Philippine Experience, as well as fiesty commentaries from mindanao is the land, promise « Geisha (gay’sya) Diaries and Mindanao « the Scribe in Me and The Art and Science of – Notes from an Apathetic Atenean Doctor. As well as idiosyncratic thoughts: hay.. and A SCENARIO EVERYONE SHOULD WATCH OUT « THE MOUNT BALATUCAN MONITOR.
On a more philosophical note, two entries discuss A Just War | Filipino Voices and A Just War: Road to A Just Peace | Filipino Voices (what is a “Just War”? See Just War – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia). The voices raised against war are few and far between, see: Oppose the Mindanao War « Pinoy Observer
And while some will ask (and perhaps hope) Critical Criterion Edition: Peace in Mindanao? Here is A sober reminder that the war is real | Filipino Voices which makes for cautionary reading, as does this entry from General Santos City, in For the Children | HomewardBound:
12:52 PM Our principal called for an emergency meeting, the second meeting we had today that zeroed in on matters of safety and security. The schools has received calls that messages were circulating about schools in General Santos City whose students and teachers were hostaged. We were not very sure of the report but for the reason that we have to secure the safety of our students, we have decided to send them home.
However, we could not simply let them take the public transport, which will drop them in downtown GenSan. So, we arranged for vehicles that will take them to their respective homes. Those who have their own vehicles were fetched by their parents.
What happened in the elementary school is a different story. Panicking parents rushed to the school fetching their kids. Some drivers told us about the chaos in the elementary school.
Some member of the authorities went to our school to reassure us that none of the reported events were true and that we are relatively safer here. That’s a bit of a relief. But who knows what will happen next? Better safe than sorry.
Intuitive: We Need Your Prayers echoes the unreported reality for most Filipinos, worried about loved ones and even their property and livelihoods. Meanwhile, everyone waits to see which side will escalate matters and bring the front lines to other metropolitan centers of the Philippines.
grd,
not sure if NY times is a fan of Obama…
President Apostate:
That an Obama presidency would cause such complications in our dealings with the Islamic world is not likely to be a major factor with American voters, and the implication is not that it should be. But of all the well-meaning desires projected on Senator Obama, the hope that he would decisively improve relations with the world’s Muslims is the least realistic.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/opinion/12luttwak.html
And the coup de grace: Soros’ group stage-managed London boy Georgia’s president Saakashvili to stir up trouble in the Caucasus, bringing in meddling U.S.of A., who have two unfinished wars by the way.
And candidate McCain spews out strong words. He claims he knows foreign policy but may be a Vietnam vet, but my dear, being a POW is so far from the great game. He is definetely clueless.
Well, its in the same way that that jerk Fox TV host said VP aspirant what’s-her-name Pilan knows foreign policy because Alaska is neighbor to Russia. What the heck?
it’s politics by the way. we should not kill each other. My vote will always be for Republicans.
statistic shows: Obama is up 8 points from female voters while McCain is up 6 points from male voters on rassmussen report…
Picking Palin is a strategic decision.
Simple jedis comprehend not, Leytenian’s last post. Explain, commenter should.
Master Yoda,
On Palin,
Women swing voters: Democratic Presidential Nomination found that 36% of voters nationwide say they are certain to vote for Obama in November and 34% are certain they will vote for McCain. That leaves a very significant 30% who are not certain to support either of the presumptive nominees.http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/30_of_voters_could_change_their_mind_between_now_and_election_day_56_are_women
“There have been significant changes in perception of John McCain in the two days of polling since he named Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate. Since then, 49% of Republicans voice a Very Favorable opinion of McCain. That’s up six percentage points from 43% just before the announcement. Also, 64% of unaffiliated voters now give positive reviews to McCain, up ten points since naming his running mate.”
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
Palin herself made a good first impression and is now viewed favorably by 53% of voters nationwide. Her counterpart, Joe Biden, is viewed favorably by 48%. While Palin has made a good first impression, the more significant numbers will come a week from now after the nation has a chance to learn more about her.
Palin will make US history as the first Woamn VP and Obama will make US history as the first Black President of which is really his intention. That intention is purely ” utang na loob and debt of gratitude to his ancestors” lol..
ang baba ng tax sa usa ha.
kaya naman hindi librea ang ospital at college tuition.
baka naman obama needs the tax money to pay for the war?
It’s often said that we pinoys engage in ‘personality’ politics.
Now that I’ve seen Sarah Palin’s speech, aba pati rin pala mga Kano
Sarah rambled on and on and on about her husband, kung ilang taon na sila kasal, kung ano ginagawa ng anak niya…blah blah blah and all these personal things that are irrelevant…and she ended her speech with “I god bless you all”
“Under both Democratic plans, tax rates would increase by 3 percentage points for each of the 25 percent, 28 …..”
The projected USA deficit for next year is ~$500B
My naive tambay sa kanto analysis
1. Don’t increase tax (or even better, say you are going to cut tax) = Pogi points but in reality, you are just prolonging the agony. Eventually someone has to pay if not you, it will be your children. If not them, it will their children.
2. The republicans have found a way to plug the deficit. (Langis sa alaska? More WMD sales to rogue nations? Take some of Iraq’s money? Maybe Sarah Palin can pray to God who will give her $500B in one dollar ‘in god we trust’ bills? Where, saan kukunin ni McCain ang pambayad sa deficit??)
It is very difficult to have a disscussion with pundits bordering on lunacy.
The Pinoy “utang na loob” is based on an economic base of very little choices and that is why it is called a neo colony and neo feudal society. Your life and limb is dependent on patronage.
The struggles of the Afriacn Americans in the U.S. was the opposite. They fought to be given equal opportunities from the neo-slave status.
Hence the influx of colored immigrants benefitted greatly from that opening and increased choices of opportunity.
Then the issue of Bretton Woods. Replacing gold with the U.S. dollar effectively repudiated the U.S. debt in gold. You simply print ,money without any base of production.
So the U.S. has the commanding heights in international trade.
Those countries like China and India who have stringent capital accounts are actually practicing economic sovereignty over their fiscal and monetary policies. Hence they are politically more independent in making economic and political policy choices.
On the level of a nation state that is what freedom is all about. But that is possible becuse they are economicall developing with a sort of “China Wall” versus economic colonization. They get to choose.
The U.S. economy has had to pay for all their military advances and had to become a strategic debtor to the world. All that military advances which had also resulted in technological advances has moved the U.S. in the red. It is now called an Empire of Debt.
It obviously is unsustainable. Rome fell because it’s emperors had to pay in silver for its mercenary armies. They started shaving off the content of silver and that is the basis for monetary inflation.
Maintaining empire is expensive. The global economic imbalances caused by the U.S. consuming more than it is producing is slowly moving the U.S. downhill.
The U.S. national debt with the continuing addtional deficit spending plus the trade deficits have to be financed by someone.
The world is now realizing that the international system is close to collapse.
Unless the U.S. changes its culture of consumption and puts its fiscal house in order the world will be facing a once in a lifetime crisis again.
War will become necessary to break the deadlock.
The ultimate form of demand destruction is warfare.
Trade becomes a zero sum game.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/17/magazine/17pessimist-t.html?_r=1&ref=business&oref=slogin
“The United States, Roubini went on, will likely muddle through the crisis but will emerge from it a different nation, with a different place in the world. “Once you run current-account deficits, you depend on the kindness of strangers,†he said, pausing to let out a resigned sigh. “This might be the beginning of the end of the American empire.â€Â
From Forbes Online
Croesus Chronicles
Shiller’s Subprime Solutions
Robert Lenzner 08.25.08, 6:00 AM ET
“A general bonfire is so great a necessity that unless we can make of
it an orderly and good-tempered affair in which no serious injustice
is done to anyone, it will, when it comes at last, grow into a
conflagration that may destroy much else as well.”
So wrote John Maynard Keynes in 1919 after the disastrous Versailles
peace conference. Provocateur par excellence Robert Shiller uses the
passage to open his new book on the subprime mortgage crisis, The
Subprime Solution: How Today’s Global Financial Crisis Happened, and
What to Do About It. The analogy is as simple as it is frightening.
From the start, Croesus can almost hear the flames crackling.
The Yale economist has made investment bubbles his field. He is also
an expert on housing (he is the Shiller of the S&P/Case-Shiller Home
Price Index). In this book, he provides the ignoramuses on Wall
Street, asleep-at-the-switch regulators and dumbfounded investors
worried about their savings with a stark insight to digest over the
last two weeks of summer: “We as a society do not understand or know
how to deal with speculative bubbles.”
This crisis, believes Shiller, “is a historic turning point in our
economy and our culture. … The forces unleashed by the subprime crisis
will probably run rampant for years, threatening more and more
collateral damage.”
Ordinary citizen investors and savers “see once-trusted economic
institutions collapsing around them. Once again, they feel that they
were lied to–fed overly optimistic stories that encouraged them to
take excessive risks,” he writes.
Shiller goes beneath the surface of the write-downs and the bailouts
and the fines and the litigation to ask whether “the social fabric is
indeed at risk and should be central to our attention as we respond to
the subprime crisis.”
The social fabric–the trust people have for their institutions and
their investments in them; read Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, UBS, Lehman
Brothers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac–is being challenged. These
institutions paid their senior officers more money than they have
written off in bad paper on their books. Everyone wanted to emulate them.
“To be truly revered, one had to be a smart investor as well. … A life
as an investor has become more than a means to an end; it is an end in
itself,” Shiller writes.
The bubble in real estate, like the bubble in the stock market,
transformed our culture into an expectation that everyone could be a
mover and shaker in capitalism. And cable-TV business shows promoted
that dangerous way of thinking. Yet the truth is that unchecked
financial innovation works poorly in asset markets.
The solution, suggests Shiller, is to make policy changes that will
“inhibit the development of bubbles, stabilize the housing and larger
financial markets, and provide greater financial security to
households and businesses.” He proposes a Home Owners’ Loan Corp., as
established during the New Deal in 1933, that would make credit
available to home buyers, especially if Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are
crippled. The HOLC could accept mortgages as collateral for loans to
mortgage lenders.
In the short term, Shiller says, bailouts are necessary. A cascade of
failures could make the subprime crisis a disease that continues to
spread throughout the entire economic system.
Croesus, too, fears that the time required to get an HOLC up and
running will be protracted. Rather, the Treasury Department should
immediately restore confidence in Fannie Mae’s ability to guarantee
mortgages. It could buy some of Fannie Mae’s publicly owned
securities, which would de-leverage the agency. That would support the
securities held by China, Japan, Russia and every commercial bank in
the U.S., which treat their agency holdings as Tier 1 capital. Mutual
funds like PIMCO’s have 61% of their portfolio in agency securities.
As there isn’t time to privatize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Croesus
feels the Treasury should use its newfound powers to bail out these
two giants temporarily to stem a further sharp decline in housing prices.
“The purpose of the bailouts should not be to maintain high values in
the housing market, the stock market or any other speculative market,”
Shiller says. “The essential purpose is to prevent a fundamental loss
of economic confidence in our institutions and in each other, and to
maintain a sense of social justice.”
From Bloomberg
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aqu59cnYfsFY&refer=columnist\
_pesek
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=ae3IuR_DTCc0&refer=home
“Mabini is in ermita not in malate.
Last time I was in the area Mabini and M.H. del Pilar ran from Kalaw to Quirino. Both streets run right by the famous Malate Church.”
OK, mabini and del pilar start in ermita and it reaches malate.(Quirino Avenue)
but I would not know, if the blondes reach the malate area.I keep on forgetting our age gap, I only rely on stories ,and the song Magdalena of Freddie Aguilar,you might have seen the real stuff.
unless strict ang parents mo.
Now the area is out of the fun spots,napalitan na ng mga boarding houses for transients,money changers and some restaurants, and bars.HVRDS,are you still stateside?kasi baka nasa pinas ka na sayang lang yung tinype ko.
Leytenian,
I always try not to disturb you,pero paistorbo ulit.
Di ba parati mong napapansin ang mga utang ng pinas.
Ang pambayad sainterest ng inutang natin ay kinuha sa tax at ang pambayad sa principal ay inuutang ulit.
maaring iba ang sytema sa tate,pero parang ganun na din.
madami ding utang ang tate(pinakamalaki sa buong mundo)
wag mong sabihin sa akin na iba dyan iba dito.
Yang bailouts na yan sa taxes din mapupunta yan.
yang pambayad sa utang sa taxes din mapupunta yan.
pag di tinax ang mga big corporations saan kukuha ng pondo ang gobyerno Utang ulit.as the taxman says, there are two things you can not escape:death and taxes.
yun lang death can be replaced by debt.
makikisawsaw na din dyan sa US elections na yan.
pag Experience ang pinagusapan:if the others side says your VPcandidate has no experience,they will counter your are worse off,your presidentaila candidate has no experience and our candidate has experience in running a state.
your presidentaila candidate
edit to :your candidate for president.
From probably the most trusted man in America….
On why Americans are generally “stupid”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/17/arts/television/17kaku.html?scp=1&sq=Is%20Jon%20Stewart%20The%20Most%20Trusted%20Man%20in%20America&st=cse
http://www.tomdispatch.com/p/tdvideo/shenkman06302008
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174951
“Now the area is out of the fun spots,napalitan na ng mga boarding houses for transients,money changers and some restaurants, and bars.HVRDS,are you still stateside?kasi baka nasa pinas ka na sayang lang yung tinype ko.”
Pumasyal ka sa Japan, Malaysia, Dubai, Hongkong at Singapore. Naging export model na ang mga Malate blondes. At kung medio tisay ang kutis mo masmahal ang singil. Inalis ni Mayor Lim ang mga club diyan kasi kalaban sa mga lugar sa Ongpin. Kaya lumipat sila sa Makati. At pinalayas na ang base militar nang mga kano.
Di mo ba alam yang ang export model ni Almonte. Kasi ang industriya nang Pilipinas ay nakasentro sa ber, gin and sigarillyo di siyempre yung resulta ay yung service sector ay naka base sa aliwan. Ngayon papasok na diyan ang sugal.
Matindi ang kasaysayan nang Pilipinas na nakatale sa mga negosyo na galing sa pagsakop nang Pinas nang kano.
Mag beer muna kayo sa Barangay Ginebra.
Major difference between the Pinas and the U.S. as far as foreign debt is the fact that the U.S. has a foreign debt in its own currency.
We do not have that luxury. Kaya our vaginal economy is part and parcel of our export model.
My favorite lunatic economist Bernie Villegas once suggested that Filipina women should be encouraged to marry Japanese men to reverse their negative birth rate.
The Japanese government is slowly moving to allow children born from Japs and foreigners citizenship.I wonder if Pinoy entrepreneurs will have the gumption to open entertainment centers (CLUBS) in Japan to compete with the Japanese. Maybe Pegasus and the other like it could export their business model overseas owned by Pinoys.
The Pinay is unique in Asia because she is a mis-mash of Western and ethnic tribal cultures. That is what makes her hot to a lot of foreigners.
Don’t you notice the most popular cultural events all over the islands are beauty contests.
More from thought leaders —-
August 31, 2008
Economic View NY Times
Is History Siding With Obama’s Economic Plan?
By ALAN S. BLINDER
“CLEARLY, there are major differences between the economic policies of Senators Barack Obama and John McCain. Mr. McCain wants more tax cuts for the rich; Mr. Obama wants tax cuts for the poor and middle class. The two men also disagree on health care, energy and many other topics.”
“Such differences are hardly surprising. Democrats and Republicans have followed different approaches to the economy for as long as there have been Democrats and Republicans. Longer, actually. Remember Hamilton versus Jefferson?”
“Many Americans know that there are characteristic policy differences between the two parties. But few are aware of two important facts about the post-World War II era, both of which are brilliantly delineated in a new book, “Unequal Democracy,†by Larry M. Bartels, a professor of political science at Princeton. Understanding them might help voters see what could be at stake, economically speaking, in November.”
“I call the first fact the Great Partisan Growth Divide. Simply put, the United States economy has grown faster, on average, under Democratic presidents than under Republicans.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/31/business/31view.html?_r=1&em=&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print
Alan S. Blinder is a professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton and former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve. He has advised many Democratic politicians.
The awesome powers given to capitalist to control the banking system has almost always resulted in unmitigated failures.
How does government choose which side or degree of the regulatory spectrum to initiate policies and programs.
The executive under Congressional oversight is in charge of fiscal policy and currency. The Central Bank is supposed to act as the ultimate check and balance versus abuses in fiscal policy through monetary policy.
Ultimately even oversight over central banks are exercised by the legislature in theory.
That is okay in domestic national economies theoretically. What happens when finance capital goes global in unregulated markets.
There is no global government yet existing to impose regulations.
Would you trust Villafuerte and Bunye with your savings????These two political hacks of GMA sit on the Monetary Board.. They both have a fixed tenured position.
More on some theories from dead philosophers that are so relevant in these interesting times.
” I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802)
3rd president of US (1743 – 1826)
“The theory that can absorb the greatest number of facts, and persist in doing so, generation after generation, through all changes of opinion and detail, is the one that must rule all observation.â€Â
Adam Smith
KG,
you are right about US debts, it will eventually be paid by the tax payer but in many ways. US has many options.
for example: healthcare budget can be capped, clinton did this during his term. as a healthcare professional during his time, I lost my job as a physical therapist in 1997. It took me another year to start my own and venture into business. The rest of my friends were very depressed and some even filed bankcruptcy and have ruined their credits. clinton also cut the budget for national security. for example, he closed almost 3 military bases in florida, not sure how many all over the states. that’s how the democrats balance the deficit at least in my observation during my stay here.
if obama will win, he will cut the budget for healthcare… hillary clinton propose it as Universal healthcare. It means healthcare for all but reimbursement for service will be cut up to 30%. I have a feeling that many of my relatives who remains to be in the healthcare field will definitely be affected due to salary reduction or may actually lose their jobs. in terms of foreign policy, Obama will pull out of Iraq sooner as he always say to cut expenses. Both policies will eventually balance the budget deficit.
As for the republicans, it’s policy is to support corporation to grow and employ more people. Full employment will collect taxes and decrease government spending on healthcare costs as employer will supplement and provide healthcare benefit to its employees. Or thru investment like Iraq privatization of its oil resources,trade and many more.
Both parties have its own agenda. what’s obvious to me is the agenda of democrat to cut healthcare budget . This will hurt our many nurses, doctors here in the US. For those philippine nurses who are planning to come may not be able to come. The ripple effect of losing income and employment in the healthcare industry will decrease OFW remittances. This is my opinion but i have always been prepared and i trust my instinct.
Cash is king… It’s in Medicare and Medicaid.. Cutting healthcare costs will balance the deficit but will hurt very many… For those of you who have relatives, let them prepare if Obama wins.
How does a state capitalize its own central bank with more debt and expect the central bank to be independent?????
Opinion
Core
By Benjamin E. Diokno
Window dressing
“Budget numbers are not always what they appear to be. And for an administration that is obsessed with balancing the budget during her watch, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo will no doubt explore all possible means to fudge fiscal numbers in order to show lower spending and higher revenues than what they actually are.”
“The most recent move to window dress the fiscal numbers is the decision of the government to float bonds to recapitalize the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP). For those who are unfamiliar with the issue, as part of the monetary reforms in the early 1990s, recall that the financially distressed Central Bank was replaced by BSP.”
“But as part of the reform, and in order to ensure the independence of BSP, the national government is obligated to capitalize BSP by P50 billion. After the initial P10-billion capitalization of BSP in 1993, succeeding administrations have failed to appropriate in the national budget the remaining balance of P40 billion.”
Story Location: http://www.bworldonline.com/BW082708/content.php?id=144
“Cash is king… It’s in Medicare and Medicaid.. Cutting healthcare costs will balance the deficit but will hurt very many… For those of you who have relatives, let them prepare if Obama wins.” The lunatic fringe……
Metaphorically a lot of women still have not found their G-Spot. That would really equalize them with the guys.
A lot of women still prefer the caressing of the lower sphincter muscle. Hence they prefer to be sodomized. But that is an expression of power on the part of the male species.
I have always believed that if you educate a woman you will eventually educate the world. However a lot if not a majority of women remain to be educated.
They have to somehow find their G-Spot …..
That would be a more worthwhile endeavor than trying to put forth lunacy……
Misuari says :
“By March 18, 2009, our forces in MNLF Armed Forces shall reach 300,000 strong” – ango-ango
“it’s policy is to support corporation to grow and employ more people.”
how??? low tax, big deficit, high interest rates.
“thru investment like Iraq privatization of its oil resources,trade and many more.”
HOY, please lang, that is IRAQ’s Money! The usa has no right to take that to plug their deficit.
Is America ready to elect a black president?
I’d like to give the Americans the benefit of the doubt, but the way tags are being obliquely hurled, e.g. connection to radicals, terrorist, Muslim, etc, DOUBTFUL.
Wonder what would they have thought if he was instead named Lee Roy White or Mickey Wright Brown?
to Master Yoda:
The answer is “yes” to the question “are there still Americans who will only accept a male Caucasian as their president?” but that is the wrong the question. For November 2008, the better question really is “…will enough of the voters of the United States of America” elect Barack Obama?
master yoda, there was also a terrorist named tomothy macveigh, and a taliban named walker.
nash, you think sarah palin’s speech was “personal politics”? what about obama’s speeches and videos about his family, his parentage, his boyhood, played ad nauseam in the media? prejudice stems from ignorance. in america, you usually have to know a candidate before you vote for him, unlike there in the philippines where, most of the time, all one needs is a bayong of cheap groceries.
@bencard,
yes all of them. ironically it is mccain who does not speak too much of his family life. he never mentions his son in the military.
HONOR
“Japanese Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda, whose popularity plummeted after his government introduced a much-criticized medical plan for the elderly, has announced his resignation, according to media reports”
And he resigned mainly because he was unpopular!
Wow, GMA has outlasted, lemme see, 4 japanese PMs!
To think GMA is the liar and cheat…(forget about her unpopularity…)
hvrds,
“Metaphorically a lot of women still have not found their G-Spot. That would really equalize them with the guys.
A lot of women still prefer the caressing of the lower sphincter muscle. Hence they prefer to be sodomized. But that is an expression of power on the part of the male species. ”
hahahaha.. love matters the most. the G-spot topic is only good for young couples with very little experience in bed. I do believe that experience women should guide their men for ultimate sexual happiness. lol
AFTER MUCH THINKING I AM VOTING DEMOCRAT
I’m voting Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would.
I’m voting Democrat because freedom of speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.
I’m voting Democrat because when we pull out of Iraq , I trust that the bad guys will stop what they’re doing because they now think we’re good people.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe that people who can’t tell us if it will rain on Friday, CAN tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don’t start driving a Prius.
I’m voting Democrat because I’m not concerned about the slaughter of millions of babies so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as it (Democrats)
sees fit.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe three or four pointy headed elitist liberals need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would NEVER get their agendas past the voters.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe that when the terrorists don’t have to hide from us over there, when they come over here I don’t want to have any guns in the house to fight them off with.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe that no borders should exist and I think it would be a good idea to learn another language (or two).
I’m voting Democrat because I think everyone should have health care and not have to pay for it.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe oil companies’ profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn’t.
I’m voting Democrat so we can fold all Mexican citizens into our Social Security and Medicare programs free gratis as a carbon credit and atonement for our glutinous consumption of the world’s energy.
winks****
The latest news is that Sarah Palin’s 17-year-old daughter is 7-months pregnant. What a surprise this is to the McCain staff!
HVRDS,off topic pero medyo nakapasyal na din sa dalawa sa sinabing mong lugar.
(disclaimer:what I willl tell you ,is nothing new)
Sa HK malalaman mo pag hawak ng triad ang babae,pag inahit nila ang armpit nila,hawak sila ng triad;yun ay mga instik.pero pag pinoy since sanay na sila mag ahit ng kilikili di pwedeng qualifier ang armpit.
mas madalas domestic helper ang tingin sa pinay.There was a story that sharon cuneta was blocked by customs dahil ang dami nyang biniling giordano nung time na yun, ang giordano pang pinay dh; akala dh smuggler sya.
sa singapore naman,mas maganda pa ang mga taga SM, sa mga intsik na naduon.
sad story about the pinay,.
But white slavery is not limited to the pinays.
I just watched the movie “Taken” starring Liam Neeson.
in that case a rich white female almost got sold to an Arab, the thing is; it was the protagonist’s daughter. Liam neeson was a combination of james bond and wesley snipes in that film.
“But white slavery is not limited to the pinays.
I just watched the movie “Taken†starring Liam Neeson.
in that case a rich white female almost got sold to an Arab, the thing is; it was the protagonist’s daughter. Liam neeson was a combination of james bond and wesley snipes in that film.”
Not a movie but the poorer eastern European countries (including Russia) are actually sources of the vaginal economy into Europe toady.
Pero in almost all of Asia the Pinay rules….She has got attitude…..
MLQ3 call or support for the legalization of prostitution and raising sex to an accepted social form of relaxation is noteworthy. A lot more Pinays at home would get to experience orgasm from their husband and the debate on birth control would shift to the issue of the chauvinist culture of the Filipino male rather than issue of population control.
Most women would like the State to intervene in equalizing the power of women to say no -indirectly. to their own husbands.
leytenian : Under our unitary system the efforts to promote local autonomy since the 1950s have reached a dead end, because of the reluctance of most national political leaders to decentralize the powers of the national government. The centralization of power enhances their power and control over the local communities.
x-x-x-x-x-x-x
It’s clear. You are for local autonomy. It’s good. That’s what we need. We need local autonomy, not federalism. I know you’ll ask, isn’t federalism local autonomy by itself? Think again. Federalism will free us of Imperial Manila. Right! But in its place we will have States! From one collar to another!
Here’s how it is in mathematical terms using Senator Pimentel’s formula, 20/80. How much of this sharing will actually go to the LGU’s? Ony 56%! 24% of the whole pie will go to the new collar. Federalists term for it is State. Imagine how much would go the LGU’s if we simply decentralize without going through States and a cha-cha? Imagine that we can do it now because we can. It’s the only practical way to defang Gloria and her successors whoever they may be. It’s the shortest path to people empowerment.
I agree with your analysis. The main stumbling block is the national leadership or Congress. It simply won’t part with much of its powers. But what makes Senator Pimentel and other federalists think it would have a change of heart as soon as it is formed as a con-ass? Nor would a con-con be necessarily more generous! I hear words like vigilance, rallies and letters… anything to create public pressure. But if we can do it for federalism, why can’t we do it for plain and simple local autonomy? No need to create States. No need for a cha-cha.
Part of the Peace Process is to NOT TO CHANGE OUR UNITARY REPUBLIC TO THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES. No to CHACHA…
The serious weaknesses and disadvantages of our unitary system exist only because we are not decentralized enough.
Our unitary system could be more sensitive to our cultural diversity than federalism could ever be. What does federalism promise to do? Create states on the basis of religion or ethnic groupings? It is the surest formula for trouble. Did the ARMM solve the problem? On the other hand, local autonomy would deal with tribal problems by provinces and towns. RA 8371 tells us how. In federalism we will still have to grope for the rules.
Federalism will lead us into the realm of the unknown, while in local autonomy all we need is political will, a genuine concern for our less privilege brothers, not for those who point their guns at us. We can do it. RA 8371 tells us how. Federalists diagnosed the problem accurately. It’s the prescription that doesn’t fit.
Local autonomy emphasizes respect for the socio-cultural diversity of the people and seeks national unity in city and provincial diversity. It promotes national solidarity and cooperation in governance, nation-building, modernization and development.
Local autonomy emphasizes local self-rule and self-reliance in governance, based on the principle of subsidiarity. This means that decisions should be made at the lowest possible level where the problems can be solved.
While local governments are designed to be autonomous, the national government provides assistance to the various LGU’s, especially the less developed ones.
Bakit ba hindi natin harapin agad ang tunay na pagbabago? Bakit kailangan pa nating sumayaw ng CHACHA?
Tax Joven,
“It’s clear. You are for local autonomy. It’s good. That’s what we need. We need local autonomy”
True . Yet there are about 21 senators who live in Manila representing the provinces. That’s not local autonomy in terms of governance. Its too centralized, don’t you think?
Pimentel’s proposal on 80/20 is fiscal federalism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiscal_federalism
There are many types of Federalism. The Philippines can develop its own unique model of federalism based on the various models that have been adopted by other countries.
http://www.kas.de/proj/home/pub/69/2/year-2002/dokument_id-3228/index.html
“Bakit ba hindi natin harapin agad ang tunay na pagbabago? Bakit kailangan pa nating sumayaw ng CHACHA?”
Decentralization of power for local autonomy can be effected only through amendments of the Constitution.–Chacha…
Psi, compared to a province or a city, a State is hardly the entity that could kick-start economic development. For one thing, how many years will it take for a State to be able to walk on its two feet? For example, what economic progress has ARMM initiated since its birth? Yes, there will be less control and bureaucratic red tape from imperial Manila, but more of it will take place in the States!
You worry about duplicate costs and functions? You must worry more about 75 Senators and 350 Congressmen! Worry about 10 or 11 set of bureaucracies instead of only one!
Leytenian, in a highly decentralized system Senators are almost a redundancy. They may be allowed to concentrate on national and international affairs, rather than on parochial matters which the LG officials can very well take care of. You said that the “senate is a drag to our economy.†So, why create more of them? If we move to unfamiliar territory we would be squandering the lessons learned from past mistakes. We know that our unitary system is not perfect, but at least, we know why it is not so. The problem is half-solve if we know what it is.
I think we are already spending too much for legislation. Do you know how many artesian wells could be built with the amount used to maintain one municipal or city councilor? How about Senators and Congressmen? So much expense! All for what?
Leytenian: There are many types of Federalism. The Philippines can develop its own unique model of federalism based on the various models that have been adopted by other countries.
Comment: Let’s vote for federalism now. Talk about the type later. Isn’t this rather reckless? Why don’t we, instead, explore how far we could go with local autonomy under the present Charter?
Leytenian: Decentralization of power for local autonomy can be effected only through amendments of the Constitution.–Cha
Comment: What is your basis for saying this? We have a LG Code. Is that the limit on how far we can go with local autonomy? Does our Charter say we can’t go 40/60? Or even 10/90?
“he latest news is that Sarah Palin’s 17-year-old daughter is 7-months pregnant. What a surprise this is to the McCain staff!”
Surprise ba yan eh immoral nga ang condom eh. So natural lang na mabubuntis.
“I’m voting Democrat because I believe that no borders should exist and I think it would be a good idea to learn another language (or two).”
That’s already a reality in Schengen Europe.
And maybe soon, we ASEAN nations will remove our borders to allow free movement of peoples.
Hay naku, I can’t help it. I’m so socialist.
Before becoming mayor, Ms. Sarah Palin was a member of the Alaska Indepedence Party, seeking Alaska’s separation from the federal union of the USA. Apparently, she was vetted her for four days without asking questions from a single Alaskan official.
Talk of judgement.
but Master Yoda: for over 5 years 1967 to 1973, John McCain was not in a position to ask questions from Alaskan officials, much less have a Miss Alaska beauty contestant to chat with.
From The Telegraph of UK:
“The party has lobbied since the 1970s for the right to hold a referendum on whether Alaska should secede from the United States. Its motto, “Alaska First”, contrasts sharply with the John McCain campaign slogan: “Country First.”
It seeks “the complete repatriation of the public lands, held by the federal government, to the state and people of Alaska” and aims to be “self-sufficient” by using profits from Alaskan oil and gas resources. It claims that the vote held in 1958 which led to Alaska becoming the 49th state of the US was corrupt and did not offer a proper choice.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/johnmccain/2667214/John-McCains-running-mate-Sarah-Palin-was-in-Alaskan-independence-party.html
You guys are better off discussing foreign politics than domestic politics. Foreign politics are more discernable and predictable.
In Philippine politics, well, it depends who got the highest bid on coin-operated pekeng-periodistas.
What these idiots publish is not what it seems.
Good! Stick with foreign politics reported by PROFESSIONAL JOURNALIST. There you can have a informed decision.
Tax Joven,
“Talk about the type later. Isn’t this rather reckless? Why don’t we, instead, explore how far we could go with local autonomy under the present Charter?”
Of course, we can explore. Constituinal amendments or Chacha has been proposed by Ramos. How long do we need to explore?
“The first Charter change attempt on the 1987 Constitution was under former President Fidel V. Ramos. Among the proposed changes in the constitution included a shift to a parliamentary system and the lifting of term limits of public officials.”
“Under President Joseph Estrada, there was a similar attempt to change the 1987 constitution. The process is termed as CONCORD or Constitutional Correction for Development”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_Change#Charter_Change_under_Ramos
Leytenian,
I think my questions are clear enough. Why you diverse isn’t.